Surgical Techniques Following Free Cartilage Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of surgical defects with free cartilage grafts poses unique challenges. OBJECTIVES: To characterize surgical techniques following free cartilage grafting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed using the Embase, PubMed Medline, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Web of Science databases from inception to May 21, 2021. Studies describing free cartilage grafts harvested from the ear or nose under local anesthesia, specifically for reconstruction of facial surgical defects, were selected for inclusion. Only surgical defects resulting from tumor resection were included. RESULTS: In total, 34 studies involving 713 patients with 723 surgical defects met inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 63.3 ± 10.4 years. Free cartilage grafts were most commonly harvested from the ear (93.1%). The most common recipient site was the nose (90.3%), followed by the lower eyelid (6.7%) and ear (3.0%). CONCLUSION: Free cartilage grafts are an effective reconstructive option for patients with deep or cartilaginous defects that have compromised structural support on the nose, ear, or eyelid.

Computational Drug Repositioning Identifies Statins as Modifiers of Prognostic Genetic Expression Signatures and Metastatic Behavior in Melanoma.

Despite advances in melanoma treatment, more than 70% of patients with distant metastasis die within 5 years. Proactive treatment of early melanoma to prevent metastasis could save lives and reduce overall healthcare costs. Currently, there are no treatments specifically designed to prevent early melanoma from progressing to metastasis. We used the Connectivity Map to conduct an in silico drug screen and identified 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) as a drug class that might prevent melanoma metastasis. To confirm the in vitro effect of statins, RNA sequencing was completed on A375 cells after treatment with fluvastatin to describe changes in the melanoma transcriptome. Statins induced differential expression in genes associated with metastasis and are used in commercially available prognostic tests for melanoma metastasis. Finally, we completed a chart review of 475 patients with melanoma. Patients taking statins were less likely to have metastasis at the time of melanoma diagnosis in both univariate and multivariate analyses (24.7% taking statins vs. 37.6% not taking statins, absolute risk reduction = 12.9%, P = 0.038). These findings suggest that statins might be useful as a treatment to prevent melanoma metastasis. Prospective trials are required to verify our findings and to determine the mechanism of metastasis prevention.

Risk Factors for Keratinocyte Carcinoma in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants.

Importance: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) is known to increase the risk for keratinocyte carcinoma. The extent to which host characteristics, including pigmentary phenotype and UV radiation exposure, contribute is unknown. Objective: To identify and validate independent risk factors for keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT, including those associated with the transplant and the host. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study analyzed a consecutive sample of alloHCT recipients from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014, at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (n = 872) and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (n = 147). Participants from the Mayo Clinic were randomly allocated (2:1) into discovery (n = 581) and validation (n = 291) cohorts. Time to first keratinocyte carcinoma and information about transplant- and host-associated risk factors were extracted. A multivariate keratinocyte carcinoma risk model was created using a stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression model with P ≤ .05 for entry that incorporated all covariates that were individually statistically significant at α = 0.05 in the discovery cohort. The risk model was first internally validated using the Mayo Clinic validation cohort and then externally validated using the independent cohort of alloHCT recipients at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Data were analyzed from March 13, 2018, to June 12, 2019. Exposures: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to development of the first cutaneous keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT; secondary outcome, time to development of the first individual basal and/or squamous cell carcinoma after alloHCT. Results: Of the 872 alloHCT recipients identified in the Mayo Clinic cohort (520 men [59.6%]; mean [SD] age, 48.3 [12.6] years), 95 (10.9%) developed keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT during 5349 person-years of follow-up. Of the 147 alloHCT recipients in the exernal validation cohort (86 men [58.5%]; mean [SD] age, 47.9 [17.5] years), 18 (12.2%) developed keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT in 880 person-years of follow up. Risk factors independently associated with keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT included age (hazard ratio [HR] per 10 years, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.21-2.42), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.20-5.09), clinically photodamaged skin (HR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.87-6.41), and history of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.41-5.91). Harrell concordance statistics were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72-0.90) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-0.98) for internal and external validation of the keratinocyte carcinoma risk model, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found validated independent risk factors for keratinocyte carcinoma after alloHCT that are enriched with host- compared with transplant-associated risk factors. These findings highlight the importance of assessing host-associated risk factors for keratinocyte carcinoma in patients eligible for alloHCT. Future studies should examine whether keratinocyte carcinoma risk stratification before alloHCT may inform long-term surveillance strategies.

Dermatologic Device Clearance Within the Food and Drug Administration's 510(k) Pathway.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Device innovation in dermatology is increasing. Medical devices identified as "substantially equivalent" to predicate ones by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may be exempt from premarket approval through the 510(k) pathway. The 510(k) pathway has been criticized for having less stringent clinical data requirements, and implications of dermatologic device clearance via this pathway are incompletely described. The objective of this study is to characterize dermatologic device clearance via the 510(k) pathway. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the FDA's 510(k) database between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2018. Dermatologic devices were included based on product code and classified by the application. Approval pathways and decision characteristics were compared among dermatologic device categories. RESULTS: Of the 76,607 records screened, 4,637 met inclusion criteria. Laser/thermal devices comprised the largest category (64.2%), followed by wound (24.0%) and light-based devices (5.8%). The majority of 510(k) pathway submissions were traditional (89.2%) compared with alternative (10.8%) submission types (P = 0.003). Devices that were deemed substantially equivalent without limitations (98.5%) were the most common among all device categories. Rates of device clearance over the study period increased for all categories except laser/thermal devices. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologic devices are increasingly cleared via the FDA's 510(k) pathway through "substantial equivalence" with minimal requirements for premarket clinical data. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.